% The Flaming Right by paul murphy

What's good for GM

When Charles Wilson, then President of General Motors and up for confirmation as Eisenhower's Secretary of Defence, said he saw no conflict between his expected role in government and his loyalty to GM because "what's good for GM, is good for America", even GM's enemies, people who saw the company as symbolic of everything they hated about American capitalism, agreed.

Like any other big company GM had its problems; but the worst of them: its inability to make money selling CAFE compliant vehicles, was created by Congress - not the market and not the company's management.

The board level picture at GM was pretty simple: by the mid 1980s the company's early market success, some poor product choices, foreign and non union competition coupled with ever increasing union demands in Detroit, the recovery at Chrysler, and constant product litigation had left the company a behemoth shambling its way to the economic slaughterhouse known as bankruptcy court. Rather than give up, however, a few people decided to fight and GM slowly evolved a new strategy: commit to quality while moving the product line upscale, reduce worldwide dependency on the traditional unionized workforce, leverage financial markets to move product, and embark on a long term plan to reduce the impact health care and pension obligations have on day to day financial operations. Some of this worked, some of it didn't, but by the spring of 2004 GM was on course to make three billion for the year and most thought the company would muddle through.

But then a Bush deal to trade arms export permits to the Saudis for stable oil prices somehow became a plot against humanity and that triggered a four year run up in oil prices, Detroit's profitable SUV lines became symbols of profligate resource consumption on lifeboat earth, Congress imposed new CAFE standards that could not be met with existing cost structures, something triggered a confidence destroying credit crisis that crashed vehicle sales, and Obama's meteoric ascent in the media prophesized the end of low energy prices in America.

Had Mr. McCain become president the bridge financing offered the automakers by the Bush administration might well have saved both GM and Chrysler, because a McCain/Palin administration would have encouraged low cost American energy production, not abrogated the rule of law in credit markets, and not allowed Congress to incur a trillion dollar social debt in its first ninty days.

Instead Mr. Obama took office, the Pelosi ideologues idolize Michel Moore, and we are where we are - everybody loses:

So ultimately, what's the real bottom line here? if the actions taken by the Democrats in control in Congress and the Whitehouse are so utterly and obviously damaging to America why commit to them? It could just be incredible incompetence, but my money's on Wilson: because what's bad for GM is bad for America and thus irristible to the weatherman in the Whitehouse.


Paul Murphy, a Canadian, wrote and published The Unix Guide to Defenestration. Murphy is a 25-year veteran of the I.T. consulting industry, specializing in Unix and Unix-related management issues.