Canadian Electoral Reform (July 2017)
How to get rid of Notley and Trudeau
(Rejected by the Edmonton Journal, The Calgary Herald, the Edmonton Sun, and the Calgary Sun)
Unsolicited Advice for Danielle Smith (Feb 14/2015)
The Budget Blues (how to fix the oil export discount)
There is only one Taxpayer
Outsource, and re-direct, government audit
Government lay-offs: Who goes? Who stays?
Fri Jun 11 15:52:18 MST 2010
Note: all links to limesurvey have been disabled - if you have a real need or interest in them, please contact me.
Note: all issues discussed here have been raised with, and left unresolved by, Jeff Callaway, Danielle Smith, and Hal Walker.
Added: Sun Nov 28 08:37:25 MST 2010
As far as I know the reversal of power in the party, from bottom up to top down, is irreversible except through court action - or, of course, through the gradual decay and dissolution of the party over time.
The legal action required would be a petition to the court to have the decisions arrived at during the 2010 annual meeting set aside on the grounds that:
Proving these assertions is trivial.
Proving harm is harder, but the first grass roots candidate losing a nomination to a party endorsed candidate will reasonably be able to assert personal loss - and reasonably claim to be acting on behalf of the vast majority of party members because they were not consulted as their constitutional rights to direct policy, elect an executive, and select nominees were taken away.